In contrast, the main claim against the inclusion of the offence of terrorism in the rome statute of the international criminal court icc, and the statutes of other international courts and tribunals, is the absence of an internationally recognized definition of terrorism, which is at odds with the principle of legality demanding that the penalized conduct be sufficiently defined by law. The events of 11 september 2001 themselves were ubiquitously and uncontroversially characterised, and internationally condemned, as acts of international terrorism. Chapter 2 examines potential justifications and excuses for terrorist violence. Terrorism is a phenomenon to which an inordinate amount of international attention and resources have been dedicated, particularly in the post911 era. Without such an approach, an internationally sanctioned definition of terrorism may run contrary to tendencies that have recently defined the development of international law, increasing rather than reducing incoherence in the international system. Although the term is not subject to a universally agreed definition, terrorism can be broadly understood as a method of coercion that utilizes or threatens to utilize violence in order to spread fear and thereby attain political or ideological goals. This is one reason why there is still no internationally accepted definition of terrorism. Terrorism has become one of the top ranking problems. International human rights law international human rights law is reflected in a number of core international human rights treaties and in customary international law.
It was also logical that the convention on international terrorism would have a legal definition of terrorism. No universally accepted definition there is no universally accepted definition of terrorism. Pdf problems and progress in defining terrorism in international. Abstrak there is an effort to adopt an internationally accepted legal definition for terrorism since such definition will enhance international cooperation in fighting terrorism, which at the. Using section 1 of the uks terrorism act 2000 as an illustrative example, this article argues that a single definition of terrorism is invariably broad owing to the need to accommodate the lowest common denominator.
It is merely a convenient way of alluding to activities, whether of states or of individuals, widely disapproved of and in which either the methods used are unlawful, or the targets protected, or. Pdf defining terrorism in international law by ben saul. It can thus be seen that definitions have far reaching effects and perform a crucial role within wider international politics, law and counter terrorism strategy, and the. Terrorism is a phenomenon steeped in varying and oftentimes. Many definitions of terrorism exist, but there is no consensus on a single, universal definition. United states accept the new forums jurisdiction and its right to. This is the first time that an international tribunal has authoritatively confirmed a general definition of terrorism under international law. Jan 12, 2017 some say that the search for an accepted definition on terrorism in international law resembles the quest for the holy grail.
Special tribunal for lebanon issues landmark ruling on. In an action under subsection a for an injury arising from an act of international terrorism committed, planned, or authorized by an organization that had been designated as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of the immigration and nationality act 8 u. Uk ministry of defence, the manual of the law of armed. Defining terrorism in the context of international law. Each state, in passing legislation on the matter, may and does of course define terrorism as it pleases. This demonstrates again that not everyone has the same view regarding the definition of this crime, it is thus rather subjective. Chapter 1 sets out the policy rationales for defining and criminalising terrorism and develops, based on these rationales, a basic definition of terrorism. Aug 03, 2015 the fbi defines terrorism, according to u. International terrorism law and legal definition uslegal, inc. Most researchers tend to believe that an objective and internationally accepted definition of terrorism can never be agreed upon. Terrorism is a phenomenon steeped in varying and oftentimes conflicting political and ideological beliefs. Ben saul, defining terrorism in international law human.
Introduction the uk uses the same legal definition for every situation in which terrorism is a legallyrelevant category. International treaties against terrorism and the use of. The divergent definitions also reflect the political preoccupations of particular regional groupings, especially concerning the validity of exclusions from any definition of terrorism p. If the goal is to create international legal obligations to fight something, this something needs to be defined. Human rights, terrorism and counterterrorism ohchr. Defining terrorism in national and international law. It is noteworthy, in this respect, that for instance canadian law, which for a long time has refrained from giving an express definition of terrorism, did develop a definition in order to comply with the most recent. This article addresses a significant historical gap in examining the interplay between international obligations and domestic definitions, the. International terrorism law and legal definition uslegal. Jul 28, 20 one view is that this absence of an internationally accepted definition of terrorism has led to international lawlessness and unilateral vigilantism acharya, 2008.
Terrorism in international and regional treaty law. A definition of terrorism is necessary for making laws, designed to ban terrorism and assistance to 1 boaz ganor. It will, in other words, have to reconcile political expediency with international law. Each state must, and does, create its own definition. State actors in an international definition of terrorism from a. Pdf defining terrorism in international law by ben. Prosecuting terrorists at the international criminal court.
The need for a generally accepted definition of international terrorism is self. Sep 14, 2015 terrorism has become a world wide phenomena yet the world has failed to reach a legal definition of terrorism. Terrorism has never been defined in intemational law. Terrorismis commonly understood to refer to acts of violence that target civilians in the pursuit of political or ideological aims. However, terrorism is a phenomenon that very often affects multiple states, which are all compelled to cooperate to repress it. Reevaluating an unused legal tool to combat terrorism 2011 20 mich. Consequently, states have devised their own definitions of what constitutes terrorism that are typically found in their criminal law. A semiotic approach to the meaning of the term terrorism. Despite numerous efforts since the 1920s, the international community has failed to define or criminalize terrorism in international law. Defining terrorism in international law request pdf. Pdf problems and progress in defining terrorism in. This was the view taken by aksenova, who remarked that.
Apr 07, 2014 4 reluctance to define terrorism international organisations are aware of the definition issue, yet they hesitate to create universally accepted definition. Multifaceted criminal notion of terrorism in international law. Is one mans terrorist another mans freedom fighter. Problems and progress in defining terrorism in international law. The question of who is a terrorist, according to this school of thought, depends entirely on the subjective outlook of the definer. Terrorism is a concept that defies a simple and straightforward legal definition.
The international communitys legal response to terrorism 1989 38 international and comparative law quarterly. The first difficulty is calibrating a definition with such precision that it criminalises the bad. If you are completing all of lesson i in one class period, then skip step 4b. Should grave crimes of international terrorism be included. The united nations in the fight against terrorism javier. Headway has been made, ben saul confirms, but an ultimately successful definition will have to walk a fine line. The need for a generally accepted definition of international terrorism is selfevident. These treaties include in particular the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, and the international covenant. Such a definition would raise more problems than it resolves. Although international law may not be accused of addressing the issue of terrorism.
The problem of definition at the present time there is no universally accepted definition of terrorism. International terrorism has also become a dominant factor in international relations but no agreed definition of terrorism exists, much less effective international mechanisms for punishing terrorists. Laws free fulltext the evolving common law jurisprudence. An internationally accepted definition of terrorism is required to strengthen cooperation between countries in the struggle against terrorism and to ensure its effectiveness. Terrorism in international and regional treaty law oxford. Jun 25, 2007 defining terrorism in international law is divided into five chapters. Then the types of terrorism will be enumerated as a prelude to a more specific focus on international and transnational forms of terrorism as exemplars of the relationship of terrorism to globalization. The first quality worth remarking on is the sheer diversity and range of activities encompassed by even restrictive notions of terrorism. The challenge of defining terrorism establishing a universally accepted definition of terrorism remains a work in progress. Terrorism in international law chapter 2 the war on. Notwithstanding the absence of a globally agreed, legal definition of terrorism, an effective and preventionfocused international response to terrorism is highly desirable, particularly one guided by a normative legal framework and embedded in the core principles of the rule of law, due process and respect for human rights.
Under international law, the phenomenon of terrorism has been defined in various treaties. The use of serious violence against persons or property or the threat to use such violence, to intimidate or coerce a government, the public, or any section of the public, in order to promote political, social, or ideological objectives. International terrorism law and legal definition international terrorism is terrorism practiced in a foreign country by terrorists who are not native to that country. Defining terrorism in the context of international law anna. State actors in an international definition of terrorism. There is no explicit definition of terrorism as such in international humanitarian. International terrorism involves citizens or the territory of more than one country. The struggle of finding a clear international definition is tangible since the 1930s. Defining terrorism in national and international law ius gentium. In the absence of an accepted international definition of terrorism, this chapter evaluates the international communitys response to terrorism in treaty law. This book first explores the policy reasons for defining.
State actors in an international definition of terrorism from. Hjalmar hannesson iceland said terrorism must never be tolerated or excused. Even today there is no single universal definition. Pdf abstrak there is an effort to adopt an internationally accepted legal definition for terrorism since such definition will enhance. Now the term terrorism is commonly used to describe terrorist acts committed by nonstate or subnational entities against a state. Yet the decision to take a onesize fits all approach to defining terrorism was taken without much. The problem of defining terrorism has vexed the international community for. The multifaceted criminal notion of terrorism in international law. An article is one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. That might mean, for example, that it is illegal under international law for the united states. This has become a major obstacle to meaningful international counter measures. Before briefly tracing the history of international responses to terrorism, this essay presents observations on the question of definition or nomenclature. If, for example, september 11, 2001 was a crime and not war, then the laws of armed conflict do not apply to the actions of the united states and its allies against al qaeda and the taliban militia. International law and terrorism law essays essaysauce.
Problems of legal definition 273 ii legal definitions of terrorism a international law as michael p scharf has noted, the problem of defining terrorism has vexed the international community for years. It shows that since the 1960s, many anti terrorism or sectoral treaties have objectively regulated specific activities often described politically as terroristic, without creating a distinct generic crime of terrorism, or distinguishing. As a result, the international legal system remains incomplete, sometimes inconsistent. This decision will likely have a momentous effect on the decadeslong effort of the international community to develop a broadly acceptable definition of terrorism. For example, kydd and walter define terrorism as the use of violence against civilians by nonstate actors to attain political goals.
The obligations established by the international treaties against terrorism the principal obligation set forth in the international treaties against terrorism is to incorporate the crimes defined in the treaty in question into the domestic criminal law, and to make them punishable by sentences that reflect the gravity of. However, without a universally accepted definition, a framework for global cooperation against terrorism has been established. Whether this is a fair and objective method will be critically evaluated through each chapter. Almost by definition customary international law develops and changes over. John dugard, the problem of definition of terrorism in international law, 2005, in paul eden and therese. Forthcoming, international and comparative law quarterly alan greene lecturer in law, durham law school alan. In the second part of the paper i will try to apply these requirements and define terrorism in accordance to them. Footnote 1 this definition, in section 1 of the terrorism act 2000, is vague, broad and widely criticized by experts, courts and academics. Dozens of definitions have been attempted over the last thirty years but a consensus about an appropriate definition. In the absence of accepted general definition of terrorist, the author ex. However, terrorism is a phenomenon that very often affects multiple states.
In the absence of an international legal definition of terrorism, each country has interpreted and adopted a framework for categorising the phenomenon. In chapter 4, saul examines whether customary international law accepts that there is a generic international crime, or distinct legal concept, of. International law aspects of countering terrorism united nations. The us department of state defines terrorism as premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or. This article challenges the idea, both in domestic and international law, of defining terrorism. Step 5 at the end of the group work, ask the reporters from each group to briefly report on their groups definition of terrorism. Mar 02, 2009 assessing domestic legal definitions ucla journal of international law and foreign affairs, vol.
1339 769 1713 423 142 1778 1868 732 487 950 279 1435 1109 1369 717 1237 1568 653 1230 1792 1578 55 335 890 1209 38 1689 1457 827 720 1599